Skip to content

Essay Movie Glory

Glory captures the heroism of Colonel Robert Gould Shaw and the first black regiment in the Civil War, the Massachusetts “Fighting” Fifty-fourth.  An extremely talented cast and crew earned three Academy Awards (cinematography, sound and supporting actor) and five nominations for their work in Glory.  The outstanding cinematography, sound, score and acting recreate the events leading up to the Union attack on Fort Wagner on July 18th 1863.

Matthew Broderick portrays the young Bostonian abolitionist Col. Robert G. Shaw who takes command of the Fifty-fourth, following the Emancipation Proclamation.  Shaw along with Cabot Forbes (Cary Elwes) leads a band of ex slaves, servants and other black volunteers including a rebellious runaway slave Trip (Denzel Washington), Shaw’s educated childhood friend Thomas Searles (Andre Braugher), and a former grave digger Rawlins (Morgan Freeman).  Together these men face the adversity of a racist Union Army, struggling to prove themselves worthy of their government issued blue uniforms.  After months of training and exploitation for physical labor, the Fifty-fourth gains the opportunity to fight in an attack on Fort Wagner on the beaches of South Carolina.  Poised to dispel the belief that blacks would not be disciplined under fire, the Fifty-fourth leads the almost suicidal attack on Ft. Wagner.  There Col. Shaw valiantly falls and the Fifty-fourth, suffering great losses, displayed the courage that persuaded the Union to enlist many more black soldiers.  Matthew Broderick delivers a noteworthy performance in the role of Col. Shaw, which Leonard Maltin calls his most ambitious part.  In an interview for the New York Times, Broderick spoke of his method acting,  “The first step [in preparing for the role of Robert Gould Shaw in Glory] was to try to learn as much as I could about the real person.  That was mostly from letters, photographs, descriptions and a poem by Emerson.  The thing I had to do was bring myself into that situation.  I didn’t want to be an imitation of what I thought Shaw must have been like.”  Broderick’s acting talent has been noted on Broadway as well as in films.  Broderick won a Tony Award for his performance in “Brighton Beach Memoirs” in 1983, a year after his film debut in Max Dugan Returns. (Maltin, 102) But it was his role as a computer hacker in War Games and his role as a handsome young teen touring Chicago in Ferris Bueller’s Day Off that alerted moviegoers to his talent.  Denzel Washington has received critical acclaim for his role as Trip (as well as an Oscar for Best Supporting Actor).

Denzel commented on the role of Trip in an interview with the New York Times.  “Trip’s an instigator – wild, rebellious, angry.  He’s a product of racism who’s become a racist.  He hates all white people, Confederates most of all. But in the end, when he sees the white officers make the maximum sacrifice, he’s the most patriotic one in the bunch.”  Director of Glory, Edward Zwick described Washington by stating, “Whatever that mysterious chemical process is that makes the camera love someone, he has more of it than any one person should.”(Maltin, 921)  It is that presence that earned him an Oscar for Glory and nominations for his roles in Cry Freedom and Malcolm X.  Equally as important as acting to the impact of the movie Glory is the Musical score composed by James Horner.  In the final battle scene in Glory, Horner chose the Boys Choir of Harlem which creates a moving effect during the death of Col. Robert Shaw.(Magill, 158)  Horner won a Grammy Award for the score for Glory.  He was nominated the same year for an Academy Award for the score for Field of Dreams.  Horner’s previous Grammy Awards include song of the year and best song written for a motion picture or television, all for “Somewhere Out There” from An American Tale in 1987. (CTFT, 228)  Leonard Maltin calls Horner one of today’s most prolific film composer’s.  Horner composed thirty one motion picture scores from 1979 to 1989. (Maltin, 411)  There are many elements that contribute to the success of a film.  Glory combines the best cinematography, sound, score, and acting to create a moving representation of this portion of U. S. history.  Roger Ebert called it a “strong and valuable film.”  In his review written for the Chicago Sun-Times, Ebert notes the amount of effort devoted to accurate period detail.  One of Ebert’s criticisms of Glory is that the perspective of the movie is constantly seen from one view, that of the white officer.  Ebert points out that a white man is cast as the lead role when the movie is essentially about a black experience.  Glory could have been told from the eyes of a black soldier in the Fifty-fourth.  Ebert makes a valid assumption when he suggest that a totally different film could be made from the same material.  Indeed Glory is a story of how the freed blacks were able to prove themselves in battle.  The Fifty- fourth regiment could also be considered one of the first times we see blacks look for equal opportunity.  Ebert notes the scene when the black soldiers of the Fifty-fourth learn they will not be paid the regular (white) wage.  “Blacks march as far, bleed as much and die as soon, they argue.”(Ebert)  It would be 100 years later that they gained equal opportunity when in Vietnam both black and white soldiers were interspersed in the military.

While Roger Ebert discusses the idea of a different point of view he notes that Glory is an important film no matter who’s eyes it is seen from.  Blake Lukas on the other hand is far more critical of the film.  In Lukas’ review for Magill’s Cinema Annual he picks at elements of the film, including weak characterization and directing that leaves something to be desired.  Lukas seems at times to be lost in his own rhetoric when he writes about the dismal war genre.  He delves into the number of Vietnam films that are “a far more popular subject in this period.”(Magill, 155)  After a brief synopsis of the film Lukas comments on the dynamics of the protagonist character who we see mature through the film.  The remaining characters Lukas believes lack dimension.  He calls the role of Cabot Forbes “fleetingly interesting”  and the role of Trip, (which Denzel Washington won Best Supporting Actor for) “predictable.”  He goes on further to say that the role of Rawlins portrayed by Morgan Freeman is only enlightened by this “brilliant actor’s own characteristic intelligence.”  Therefore without the phenomenal acting talent presented in Glory Lukas feels the movie would be flat.  In addition to finding flaw in the characterization  Lukas compares director Edward Zwick to the director John Ford.  Ford directed earlier Civil War films such as The Horse Soldiers(1959) or Sergeant Rutledge (1960)which based on the an all black calvary regiment in the  Civil War.  Lukas suggest that Ford was able to attain a “thematic richness” that alluded Zwick.  Lukas also remarks that Zwick used ineffective “emphasis on close ups and shallow focus which do little to make the film’s historical moment seem …alive in spite of admirable attention to detail in the art direction sets and costumes.”  Lukas is impressed however by Zwick’s direction of the final scene in which he uses “vigorous tracking shots”  to create a “stunning effect.”  Lukas also comments on the James’s Horner’s inventive use of the Boy’s Choir of Harlem. Lukas suggests that Zwick looked to appeal to contemporary audiences.  Interestingly enough Lukas is surprised that Glory met with such “critical and commercial success.”  Lukas also seems hung up on the past.  he makes two comments which seem out of place.  First when comparing Zwick to Ford he states that Zwick does not attempt the same “thematic richness” and that “(Zwick’s) sensibilities are more attuned with the responses of the 1989 audiences.”  I don’t think Zwick should be faulted for creating a film that is appealing to contemporary audiences.”  I certainly would not go see a film directed by Lukas.  Desson Howe reviewing Glory for the Washington Post like Lukas notes that the scriptwriter Jarre (whose credits include Rambo: First Blood Part II) provides only a superficial characterization “his script is made better by the performers.” Howe believes that the is too much “liberal eyed giddiness (thanks chiefly to the gushy, rhapsodizing score by James Horner).”  Both Ebert and Lukas acclaim Broderick’s performance of Shaw, yet Howe criticizes it writing, “In this movie he is an amiable non-presence, creating unintentionally the notion that he Fifty-fourth earned its stripes despite wimpy leadership.”  This comment lead me to wonder whether Howe and I saw the same movie.  Howe notes that the performance of Denzel Washington, and Morgan Freeman uplift the film.  Perhaps the reviewers did not have the luxury of time to research the history of Robert Gould Shaw or the Fifty-fourth.  If so they would have found that Shaw was indeed a youthful officer given charge of the Fifty-Fourth as Colonel at the age of 26.  Understanding Shaw philosophical views as an abolitionist and the societal views of blacks being subservient to whites, certainly a young man leading the first black regiment would experience a certain degree of self doubt and contradiction.  In the end Shaw develops the courage to lead his men into battle to a symbolic triumph displaying the bravery of these black soldiers.  Broderick’s portrayal of Shaw is credible from my point of view.  The credibility of Glory is heighten by the amount of effort devoted to recreating the historical details.  From the camps to the costumes Glory captures the aura of battle.  Most of the critics agree that the historical detail was a redeeming element of the film.  Glory is a film that balances it shortcomings out with exceptional talent.  Perhaps a lack of dimension in the characters is balanced with outstanding performances.  Any faults in the directing are made up by the detail put in to the film and the superior sound and score.  Glory is a carefully constructed film with a didactic theme. It is an accurate representation of the lives of Civil War soldiers.  The climax of the movie is fairly accurately represented.  The Fifty-fourth regiment had slightly over five hundred members when they marched into battle on July 18th, 1863.  Over two hundred and fifty members of the regiment died in that battle and several more were injured.  That is what proved to the white regiments looking on that the black soldiers were worthy of battle.  Glory captures that triumph.


Contemporary  Theatre, Film and Television.  Detroit: Gale Research, Volume 10  Ebert, Roger. The Chicago Sun-Times, January 12, 1990  Howe, Desson. The Washington Post, January 12, 1990  Lukas, Blake. Magill’s Cinema Annual 1990,  Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Salem Press, 1990  Maltin, Leonard.  Leonard Maltin’s Movie Encyclopedia,  The Penguin Publishing Company, New York, NY 1994.

Movie Review of Glory

  • Length: 374 words (1.1 double-spaced pages)
  • Rating: Excellent
Open Document

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - More ↓
Movie Review of Glory

The movie “Glory” tells the history and the story of the 54th Massachusetts Infantry. It became the first black regiment to fight for the North in the Civil War. The Regiment was made up of black soldiers – some were Northern freemen, some were escaped slaves. The leader was General Robert Gould Shaw, the son of Boston abolitionists. The men of the 54th Regiment proved themselves worthy of the freedom for which they fighting, and the respect of their fellow white soldiers.

“Glory” is told mainly through the eyes of Shaw, played by Matthew Broderick. At the beginning of the movie, Shaw is fighting in a battle, and manages to survive, despite heavy Union losses. He is horrified with the violence of the war, and returns home to recover from his wounds. Shaw is recruited to lead the newly formed black regiment. Although he has grown up and still retained his abolitionist opinions, he still has doubts about the capability of black troops.

The 54th Infantry was comprised of a very diverse group of men. An older gentleman, John Rawlins (played by Morgan Freeman), is the fatherly-type man of the group. He watches out for the others. Another man, Trip (Denzel Washington), is an escaped slave. Trip is a very vindictive young man – he is disrespectful, even to his own comrades. Another character, Thomas, also referred to as “Snowflake”, is a well-educated, free black man. At one point, Tripp calls Thomas a “nigger”, in response to Thomas’ quiet, respectful and educated demeanor. Meanwhile, Rawlins replied to him, “don’t forget where you came from, boy, because if you can call him a nigger, then you must be one too.”

During the civil war, white soldiers were paid wages of thirteen dollars per hour. When it came time to pay the black soldiers, they received a wage of only ten dollars. The men realize this is because of their skin color, and wonder if they should quit the regiment and return home. They want to know why they should be paid less money for the same work. After all, the blacks “march as far, bleed as much, and die as soon”, they argue. They decide to rip up their checks, in protest, but still stay to fight for the Union forces.

How to Cite this Page

MLA Citation:
"Movie Review of Glory." 13 Mar 2018

LengthColor Rating 
Movie Review of Glory Essay - Movie Review of Glory The movie “Glory” tells the history and the story of the 54th Massachusetts Infantry. It became the first black regiment to fight for the North in the Civil War. The Regiment was made up of black soldiers – some were Northern freemen, some were escaped slaves. The leader was General Robert Gould Shaw, the son of Boston abolitionists. The men of the 54th Regiment proved themselves worthy of the freedom for which they fighting, and the respect of their fellow white soldiers....   [tags: Papers]374 words
(1.1 pages)
Strong Essays[preview]
Glory Essay - Glory Glory captures the heroism of Colonel Robert Gould Shaw and the first black regiment in the Civil War, the Massachusetts "Fighting" Fifty-fourth. An extremely talented cast and crew earned three Academy Awards (cinematography, sound and supporting actor) and five nominations for their work in Glory. The outstanding cinematography, sound, score and acting recreate the events leading up to the Union attack on Fort Wagner on July 18th 1863. Matthew Broderick portrays the young Bostonian abolitionist Col....   [tags: Movie Film Review Glory Essays]
:: 5 Works Cited
1960 words
(5.6 pages)
Strong Essays[preview]
Essay about Civil War Movies: Glory - Final Take Home Essay on Glory The movie Glory is about Colonel Robert Shaw coming back from the fighting in the war and leads the first African American regiment in the Civil War, the 54th Massachusetts. The movie focuses on Captain turned Colonel Robert Shaw coming back from battle and training an African American regiment along with his friend Captain Cabot Forbes. The movie focuses on four African Americans, Sargent Rawlins, Thomas Searles, Jupiter Sharts, and Tripp, following their journey into a united division in the US military....   [tags: film analysis and review]1152 words
(3.3 pages)
Better Essays[preview]
Norman Jewison's Movie The Hurricane Essay - Norman Jewison's Movie "The Hurricane" The problem of racial discrimination has been portrayed in many films in the last 15 years. However, The Hurricane does a masterful job at addressing this issue, and will leave audience members clenching their fists in anger at the injustice that happened to a man named Rubin "Hurricane" Carter. The movie demonstrates the racial inequity that can be found in our judicial system through the impressive acting by Denzel Washington and the direction of Norman Jewison....   [tags: Movie Review Essays]912 words
(2.6 pages)
Better Essays[preview]
Film Review of Blades of Glory Essay - Blades of Glory, directed by Josh Gordon and Will Speck, is a hilarious comedy that turns figure skating into one big joke. This movie was so over-the-top, it was over over-the-top, but it kept the whole theater laughing throughout the entire movie, which is exactly what it was made to do. The movie’s plot is not very intricate, but it really doesn’t need to be. It’s about 2 Men’s Singles Figure Skaters that are the complete opposites of each other. Chazz Michael Michaels (Will Ferrell) is the notorious bad boy in figure skating, he’s very sexual and all the ladies swoon over him....   [tags: essays research papers]661 words
(1.9 pages)
Better Essays[preview]
Glory Essay - Glory The 1989 film Glory is a classic Civil War film based on the history of the 54th Massachusetts Volunteer Regiment. The film focuses on the courage displayed by the first black regiment in the Civil War, also known as the “Fighting Fifty-fourth.” The regiment headed by the admirable Colonel Robert Gould Shaw, Matthew Broderick, must overcome an enormous amount of adversity during the war. The film was daring for filmmakers Zwick and Fields because it was a film not only with, “vivid and frightening battle scenes and finely etched dramatic characters, but a film that shattered the great Civil War taboo-it told a story of African Americans(Chadwick)....   [tags: Move Film US History]1891 words
(5.4 pages)
Strong Essays[preview]
Essay on Rudy, a Review - "Rudy", set in 1975 is an award winning drama in which years of effort are rewarded by a brief moment of glory. The movie is based on the true story of Daniel Ruttiger, but was also known as Rudy among his family and friends. Rudy was five foot and weighed in at a hundred nothing. People around Rudy looked at him as a person without a spec of talent, but what those people failed to notice was his true talent of determination. Rudy was determined to live out his childhood dream of playing football for Norte Dame and nothing was going to stop him....   [tags: Film]521 words
(1.5 pages)
Good Essays[preview]
Movie Review: We Were Soldiers Essay - Movie Review: We Were Soldiers We all like to take a time out and sit down with our loved ones, and watch a heart touching movie every once in a while. What we don't do is actually take time to really focus and understand completely what the point of the movie is or what it is trying to get across to the audience. I was able to take time and sit down, and enjoy and evaluate the movie, "We Were Soldiers." I was able to come to the conclusion that it is a very accurate movie, give or take a few facts....   [tags: Film Movie Review]1370 words
(3.9 pages)
Powerful Essays[preview]
Essay about Review Of Platoon - I wasn’t expecting it, I just looked up and there it was: the disgusting, bloody, mauled body of a dead soldier. The shot was brief and I do not remember if he was strung up on a tree, if he was hanging, or what not. I was not in class the day prior due to a sleepless night led to sickness, so I was not able to watch the first part of the movie. I remembered that our class was supposed to watch a war movie; Ms. Klein was deciding between “Born on the Fourth of July” and “Platoon”. I vaguely remember her saying something about one of the movies being a slight bit, well, gruesomely horrifying....   [tags: essays research papers]519 words
(1.5 pages)
Strong Essays[preview]
Analysis of Glory Essay - Analysis of Glory      Glory is a movie about the fifty-fourth Massachusetts regiment in the civil war. This was the first all black regiment the Union ever allowed to fight. Throughout the movie one quote kept proving itself true, “We went down standing up.” The members of the fifty-fourth proved that they wanted to go down standing up just by joining the army. However there were many situations that proved this further, as the film continued.      During the regiment’s training period a message arrived at the camp....   [tags: Movies Film Glory Civil War Essays]672 words
(1.9 pages)
Good Essays[preview]

Related Searches

Movie Review         Glory         Black Soldiers         Returns Home         Skin Color         Black Man         Freeman         Losses         Capability         Fight        

In response to seeing his men’s commitment to the cause, Shaw tears up his check, as does his second in command, Cabot Forbes (Cary Elwes).

Another important time in the movie is when the men need new shoes. They have completely worn-out their old shoes, and their feet are in a ghastly, disastrous state. Shaw asks his commander-in-chief for a shipment of shoes, but is told repeatedly that rations are in effect for all war supplies, and that Shaw’s regiment was not a priority. After continual delays, Shaw becomes enraged, and threatens to report the man to the war department, for his treatment of the troops, and his own personal conduct in war affairs. Following Shaw’s impressive insistence, the commander finally orders the shipment of shoes.